% This file was created with JabRef 2.7b.
% Encoding: UTF-8

@ARTICLE{Acemoglu2012,
  author = {Acemoglu, Daron and Aghion, Philippe and Bursztyn, Leonardo and Hemous,
	David},
  title = {The Environment and Directed Technical Change},
  journal = {American Economic Review},
  year = {2012},
  volume = {102(1)},
  pages = {p.131--166},
  abstract = {This paper introduces endogenous and directed technical change in
	a growth model with environmental constraints and limited resources.
	A unique final good is produced by combining inputs from two sectors.
	One of these sectors uses "dirty" machines and thus creates environmental
	degradation. Research can be directed to improving the technology
	of machines in either sector. We characterize dynamic tax policies
	that achieve sustainable growth or maximize intertemporal welfare,
	as a function of the degree of substitutability between clean and
	dirty inputs, environmental and resource stocks, and cross-country
	technological spillovers. We show that: (i) in the case where the
	inputs are sufficiently substitutable, sustainable long-run growth
	can be achieved with temporary taxation of dirty innovation and production;
	(ii) optimal policy involves both "carbon taxes" and research subsidies,
	so that excessive use of carbon taxes is avoided; (iii) delay in
	intervention is costly: the sooner and the stronger is the policy
	response, the shorter is the slow growth transition phase; (iv) the
	use of an exhaustible resource in dirty input production helps the
	switch to clean innovation under laissez-faire when the two inputs
	are substitutes. Under reasonable parameter values (corresponding
	to those used in existing models with exogenous technology) and with
	sufficient substitutability between inputs, it is optimal to redirect
	technical change towards clean technologies immediately and optimal
	environmental regulation need not reduce long-run growth. We also
	show that in a two-country extension, even though optimal environmental
	policy involves global policy coordination, when the two inputs are
	sufficiently substitutable environmental regulation only in the North
	may be sufficient to avoid a global disaster.},
  comment = {Author contact info: Daron Acemoglu Department of Economics MIT, E52-380B
	50 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 02142-1347 Tel: 617/253-1927 Fax:
	617/253-1330 E-Mail: daron@mit.edu},
  file = {Acemoglu2009.pdf:Acemoglu2009.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Acemoglu2006,
  author = {Daron Acemoglu and Zilibotti, Fabrizio and Aghion, Philippe},
  title = {Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth},
  journal = {Journal of the European Economic Association},
  year = {2006},
  volume = {4},
  pages = {pp. 37-74},
  number = {1},
  abstract = {We analyze an economy where firms undertake both innovation and adoption
	of technologies from the world technology frontier. The selection
	of high-skill managers and firms is more important for innovation
	than for adoption. As the economy approaches the frontier, selection
	becomes more important. Countries at early stages of development
	pursue an investment-based strategy, which relies on existing firms
	and managers to maximize investment but sacrifices selection. Closer
	to the world technology frontier, economies switch to an innovation-based
	strategy with short-term relationships, younger firms, less investment,
	and better selection of firms and managers. We show that relatively
	backward economies may switch out of the investment-based strategy
	too soon, so certain policies such as limits on product market competition
	or investment subsidies, which encourage the investment-based strategy,
	may be beneficial. However, these policies may have significant long-run
	costs because they make it more likely that a society will be trapped
	in the investment-based strategy and fail to converge to the world
	technology frontier.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 2006 The MIT Press},
  issn = {15424766},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Mar., 2006},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {The MIT Press on behalf of European Economic Association},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Acemoglu2003,
  author = {Daron Acemoglu and Zilibotti, Fabrizio and Aghion, Philippe},
  title = {Vertical Integration and Distance to Frontier},
  journal = {Journal of the European Economic Association},
  year = {2003},
  volume = {1},
  pages = {pp. 630-638},
  number = {2/3},
  abstract = {We construct a model where the equilibrium organization of firms changes
	as an economy approaches the world technology frontier. In vertically
	integrated firms, owners (managers) have to spend time both on production
	and innovation activities, and this creates managerial overload,
	and discourages innovation. Outsourcing of some production activities
	mitigates the managerial overload, but creates a holdup problem,
	causing some of the rents of the owners to be dissipated to the supplier.
	Far from the technology frontier, imitation activities are more important,
	and vertical integration is preferred. Closer to the frontier, the
	value of innovation increases, encouraging outsourcing.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 2003 The MIT Press},
  issn = {15424766},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Apr. - May, 2003},
  jstor_issuetitle = {Papers and Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Congress of the European
	Economic Association},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {The MIT Press on behalf of European Economic Association},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@TECHREPORT{AEIC2010,
  author = {American Energy Innovation Council AEIC},
  title = {A business plan for {A}merica's energy future},
  institution = {American Energy Innovation Council},
  year = {2010},
  citeseerurl = {www. americanenergyinnovation.org},
  file = {AEIC2010.pdf:AEIC2010.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion2002,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe},
  title = {Schumpeterian Growth Theory and the Dynamics of Income Inequality},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {2002},
  volume = {70},
  pages = {855--882},
  number = {3},
  month = {May},
  abstract = {In this lecture, it is argued that Schumpeterian Growth Theory, in
	which growth is driven by a sequence of quality-improving innovations,
	can shed light on two important puzzles raised by the recent evolution
	of wage inequality in developed economies. The first puzzle concerns
	wage inequality between educational groups, which has substantially
	risen in the US and the UK during the past two decades following
	a sharp increase in the supply of educated labor. The second puzzle
	concerns wage inequality within educational groups, which accounts
	for a large fraction of the observed increase in wage inequality,
	although in contrast to between-group wage inequality it has mainly
	affected the temporary component of income.},
  file = {Aghion2002.pdf:Aghion2002.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00129682},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society},
  timestamp = {2010.11.25}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion1993,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe},
  title = {[How High Are the Giants' Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge
	Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth]:
	Comment},
  journal = {NBER Macroeconomics Annual},
  year = {1993},
  volume = {8},
  pages = {pp. 74-76},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 1993 The University of Chicago Press},
  issn = {08893365},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {1993},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion2005,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe and Bloom, Nick and Blundell, Richard and Griffith,
	Rachel and Howitt, Peter},
  title = {Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship},
  journal = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
  year = {2005},
  volume = {120},
  pages = {701--728},
  number = {2},
  booktitle = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
  file = {Aghion2005.pdf:Aghion2005.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {MIT Press},
  timestamp = {2010.11.25}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion2006,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter},
  title = {"Joseph Schumpeter Lecture" Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying
	Framework},
  journal = {Journal of the European Economic Association},
  year = {2006},
  volume = {4},
  pages = {pp. 269-314},
  number = {2/3},
  abstract = {In this lecture, we use Schumpeterian growth theory, where growth
	comes from quality-improving innovations, to elaborate a theory of
	growth policy and to explain the growth gap between Europe and the
	US. Our theoretical apparatus systematizes the case-by-case approach
	to growth policy design. The emphasis is on three policy areas that
	are potentially relevant for growth in Europe, namely: competition
	and entry, education, and macropolicy. We argue that higher entry
	and exit (higher firm turnover) and increased emphasis on higher
	education are more growth-enhancing in countries that are closer
	to the technological frontier. We also argue that countercyclical
	budgetary policies are more growth-enhancing in countries with lower
	financial development. The analysis thus points to important interaction
	effects between policies and state variables, such as distance to
	frontier or financial development, in growth regressions. Finally,
	we argue that the other endogenous growth models, namely the AK and
	product variety models, fail to account for the evidence on the relationship
	between competition, education, volatility, and growth, and consequently
	cannot deliver relevant policy prescriptions in the three areas we
	consider.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 2006 The MIT Press},
  file = {Aghion2006.pdf:Aghion2006.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {15424766},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Apr. - May, 2006},
  jstor_issuetitle = {Papers and Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Congress of the European
	Economic Association},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {The MIT Press on behalf of European Economic Association},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion1998,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter},
  title = {On the Macroeconomic Effects of Major Technological Change},
  journal = {Annals of Economics and Statistics / Annales d'Ã‰conomie et de Statistique},
  year = {1998},
  pages = {pp. 53-75},
  number = {49/50},
  abstract = {This paper analyses how a General Purpose Technology (GPT) diffuses
	throughout the various sectors of an economy. The model outlined
	in this paper can account for a number of empirical observations:
	in particular, the existence of delays followed by acceleration phases
	in the experimentation and implementation of a new GPT, and the occurrence
	of productivity slow-downs and wage inequality increases during the
	acceleration phase of the logistic diffusion curve. /// Cet article
	Ã©tudie le processus de diffusion d'une innovation technologique
	Ã  caractÃ¨re gÃ©nÃ©ral, autrement dit affectant l'ensemble des secteurs
	de l'Ã©conomie. Le modÃ¨le dÃ©veloppÃ© dans cet article permet de
	rendre compte de diffÃ©rents faits empiriquement Ã©tablis, en particulier
	le retard dans l'implÃ©mentation des innovations fondamentales, l'existence
	de phases d'accÃ©lÃ©ration dans l'expÃ©rimentation de ces innovations
	et qui se traduisent souvent par un ralentissement de la croissance
	de la productivitÃ©, un accroissement du chÃ´mage et/ou des inÃ©galitÃ©s
	de salaires entre employÃ©s qualifiÃ©s et non-qualifiÃ©s pendant
	les phases de diffusion intensives.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 1998 L'INSEE / GENES},
  issn = {0769489X},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Jan. - Jun., 1998},
  jstor_issuetitle = {Ã‰conomie et Ã‰conomÃ©trie de l'innovation / The Economics and Econometrics
	of Innovation},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {L'INSEE / GENES on behalf of ADRES},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion1996,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter},
  title = {Research and Development in the Growth Process},
  journal = {Journal of Economic Growth},
  year = {1996},
  volume = {1},
  pages = {pp. 49-73},
  number = {1},
  abstract = {This paper introduces into Schumpeterian growth theory an important
	element of heterogeneity in the structure of innovative activity
	-- namely, the distinction between research and development. We construct
	a simple model of growth to investigate how the (steady-state) rate
	of growth affects and is affected by the relative mix between research
	and development. Although we assume for simplicity that the total
	supply of innovative activity is given it turns out that, with one
	important exception, the growth rate responds to most parameter changes
	in the same way as in previous models where growth was determined
	by the total amount of innovative activity. In particular, the level
	of research tends to covary positively with the rate of growth, even
	in the extreme case where the general knowledge that underlies long-run
	growth is created only by secondary innovations arising from the
	development process. The exception concerns the effects of competition
	on growth. Although simpler Schumpeterian growth models implied that
	increased competition would reduce growth by reducing the incentive
	to innovate, introducing the distinction between research and development
	implies that this effect is likely to be reversed.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 1996 Springer},
  issn = {13814338},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Mar., 1996},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {Springer},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion1992,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter},
  title = {A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {1992},
  volume = {60},
  pages = {323--351},
  number = {2},
  month = {Mar},
  abstract = {A model of endogenous growth is developed in which vertical innovations,
	generated by a competitive research sector, constitute the underlying
	source of growth. Equilibrium is determined by a forward-looking
	difference equation, according to which the amount of research in
	any period depends upon the expected amount of research next period.
	One source of this intertemporal relationship is creative destruction.
	That is, the prospect of more future research discourages current
	research by threatening to destroy the rents created by current research.
	The paper analyzes the positive and normative properties of stationary
	equilibria, in which research employment is constant and GNP follows
	a random walk with drift, although under some circumstances cyclical
	equilibria also exist. Both the average growth rate and the variance
	of the growth rate are increasing functions of the size of innovations,
	the size of the skilled labor force, and the productivity of research
	as measured by a parameter indicating the effect of research on the
	Poisson arrival rate of innovations; and decreasing functions of
	the rate of time preference of the representative individual. Under
	laissez faire the economy's growth rate may be more or less than
	optimal because, in addition to the appropriability and intertemporal
	spillover effects of other endogenous growth models, which tend to
	make growth slower than optimal, the model also has effects that
	work in the opposite direction. In particular, the fact that private
	research firms do not internalize the destruction of rents generated
	by their innovations introduces a business-stealing effect similar
	to that found in the partial-equilibrium patent race literature.
	When we endogenize the size of innovations we find that business
	stealing also makes innovations too small.},
  file = {Aghion1992.pdf:Aghion1992.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00129682},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society},
  timestamp = {2010.11.25}
}

@ARTICLE{Aghion1994a,
  author = {Aghion, Philippe and Tirole, Jean},
  title = {The Management of Innovation},
  journal = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
  year = {1994},
  volume = {109},
  pages = {pp. 1185-1209},
  number = {4},
  abstract = {The paper analyzes the organization of the R&D activity in an incomplete
	contract framework. It provides theoretical foundations: (a) to understand
	how the allocation of property rights on innovations may affect both
	the frequency and the magnitude of these innovations; (b) to rationalize
	commonly observed features in research employment contracts, such
	as shop rights, trailer clauses, and the "hired for" doctrine; (c)
	to discuss the robustness of the so-called Schumpeterian hypotheses
	to endogenizing the organization of R&D; and (d) to provide a rationale
	for cofinancing arrangements in research activities.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 1994 Oxford University Press},
  issn = {00335533},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Nov., 1994},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Alic2010,
  author = {Alic, John and Sarewitz, Daniel and Weiss, Charles and Bonvillian,
	William},
  title = {A new strategy for energy innovation},
  journal = {Nature},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {466},
  pages = {316--317},
  number = {7304},
  month = jul,
  comment = {10.1038/466316a},
  file = {Alic2010.pdf:Alic2010.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {0028-0836},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited.
	All Rights Reserved.},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@TECHREPORT{Alvarez2009,
  author = {Gabriel Calzada Alvarez and Raquel Merino Jara and Juan Ramon Rallo
	Julian},
  title = {Study of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to Renewable Energy
	Sources},
  institution = {Universidad Rey Juan Carlos},
  year = {2009},
  month = {March},
  file = {Alvarez2009.pdf:Alvarez2009.pdf:PDF},
  journal = {Universidad Rey Juan Carlos},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@TECHREPORT{Apollo-Alliance2004,
  author = {Apollo-Alliance},
  title = {New Energy for America, The {A}pollo Jobs Report: For Good Jobs \&
	Energy Independence},
  institution = {Apollo Alliance},
  year = {2004},
  month = {January},
  citeseerurl = {www.apolloalliance.org},
  file = {Apollo-Alliance2004.pdf:Apollo-Alliance2004.pdf:PDF},
  journal = {The Apollo Alliance},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.25}
}

@ARTICLE{Arellano1987,
  author = {Arellano, M},
  title = {Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-Groups Estimators},
  journal = {Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics},
  year = {1987},
  volume = {49},
  pages = {431-34},
  number = {4},
  month = {November},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  abstract = { The purpose of this note is to explain how to use standard packages
	to calculate heteroskedasticity and serial c orrelation consistent
	standard errors for within-groups estimators of a linear regression
	model from panel data. The within-groups estimat or is calculated
	as the least squares estimator in a transformed mult ivariate regression
	with cross-equation linear restrictions. The Whit e standard errors
	obtained in this way are the desired ones. Copyright 1987 by Blackwell
	Publishing Ltd},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.30}
}

@ARTICLE{Arellano1991,
  author = {Arellano, Manuel and Bond, Stephen},
  title = {Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence
	and an Application to Employment Equations},
  journal = {Review of Economic Studies},
  year = {1991},
  volume = {58},
  pages = {277-97},
  number = {2},
  month = {April},
  abstract = { This paper presents specification tests that are applicable after
	estimating a dynamic model from panel data by the generalized method
	of moments, and studies the practical performance of these procedures
	using both generated and real data. The authors' generalized method
	of moments estimator optimally exploits all the linear moment restrictions
	that follow from the assumption of no serial correlation in the errors
	in an equation which contains individual effects, lagged dependent
	variables, and no strictly exogenous variables. They propose a test
	of serial correlation based on the generalized method of moments
	residuals and compare this with Sargan tests of over-identifying
	restrictions and Hausman specification tests. Copyright 1991 by The
	Review of Economic Studies Limited.},
  url = {http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/restud/v58y1991i2p277-97.html}
}

@ARTICLE{Arrow1962,
  author = {Arrow, Kenneth J.},
  title = {The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing},
  journal = {The Review of Economic Studies},
  year = {1962},
  volume = {29},
  pages = {155--173},
  number = {3},
  month = {Jun},
  file = {Arrow1962.pdf:Arrow1962.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00346527},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Review of Economic Studies Ltd.},
  timestamp = {2010.11.25}
}

@TECHREPORT{Atkinson2010,
  author = {Atkinson, Robert D.},
  title = {Clean Technology Manufacturing Competitiveness: The Role of Tax Incentives},
  institution = {Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF)},
  year = {2010},
  month = {May},
  file = {Atkinson2010.pdf:Atkinson2010.pdf:PDF},
  journal = {Testimony before the United States Senate Committee on Finance, Subcommittee
	on Energy, Natural Resources, and Infrastructure},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Bentham2008,
  author = {Arthur van Benthem and Kenneth Gillingham and James Sweeney},
  title = {Learning-by-doing and the optimal solar policy in {C}alifornia},
  journal = {The Energy Journal},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {29},
  pages = {p131--152},
  number = {3},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.30}
}

@TECHREPORT{Blasi2007,
  author = {Blasi, Albrecht and Requate, Till},
  title = {Subsidies for Wind Power: Surfing down the Learning Curve?},
  institution = {Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics},
  year = {2007},
  type = {Economics Working Papers},
  number = {2007,28},
  abstract = {We develop a model with two types of electricity producers, fossil
	fuel utilities generating emissions, and suppliers of electricity
	from renewable resources such as wind energy. We account for the
	vertical structure of the wind-energy sector by considering wind-turbine
	producers engaged in learning by doing and selling their turbines
	to turbine operators. We show that in the absence of learning spillovers
	a first-best policy requires Pigouvian taxes only. We also study
	second-best optimal subsidies on electricity generated by wind power
	when (optimal) emission taxes are ruled out. We further investigate
	the impact of subsidies on prices, output, the number of firms, and
	environmental damage. It turns out that, in the case of purely private
	learning, secondbest optimal subsidies should only account for the
	environmental damage but are not necessary to spur learning. --},
  keywords = {learning by doing; renewable energies; environmental policy; Pigouvian
	taxes; subsidies; feed-in tar}
}

@ARTICLE{Boef2008,
  author = {Boef, Suzanna De and Keele, Luke},
  title = {Taking Time Seriously},
  journal = {American Journal of Political Science},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {52},
  pages = {pp. 184-200},
  number = {1},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  abstract = {Dramatic world change has stimulated interest in research questions
	about the dynamics of politics. We have seen increases in the number
	of time series data sets and the length of typical time series. But
	three shortcomings are prevalent in published time series analysis.
	First, analysts often estimate models without testing restrictions
	implied by their specification. Second, researchers link the theoretical
	concept of equilibrium with cointegration and error correction models.
	Third, analysts often do a poor job of interpreting results. The
	consequences include weak connections between theory and tests, biased
	estimates, and incorrect inferences. We outline techniques for estimating
	linear dynamic regressions with stationary data and weakly exogenous
	regressors. We recommend analysts (1) start with general dynamic
	models and test restrictions before adopting a particular specification
	and (2) use the wide array of information available from dynamic
	specifications. We illustrate this strategy with data on Congressional
	approval and tax rates across OECD countries.},
  copyright = {Copyright © 2008 Midwest Political Science Association},
  issn = {00925853},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Jan., 2008},
  language = {English},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {Midwest Political Science Association},
  timestamp = {2013.03.20}
}

@TECHREPORT{Bond2009,
  author = {Christopher S. “Kit” Bond},
  title = {Yellow Lights on Green Jobs},
  institution = {US Senate Subcommittee on Green Jobs and the New Economy.},
  year = {2009},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Chakravorty1997,
  author = {Chakravorty, Ujjayant and Roumasset, James and Tse, Kinping},
  title = {Endogenous Substitution among Energy Resources and Global Warming},
  journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
  year = {1997},
  volume = {105},
  pages = {1201--34},
  number = {6},
  abstract = {This paper examines the potential role of carbon sequestration in
	forests under a range of exogenously chosen carbon price paths. The
	price paths were chosen to simulate several different climate change
	policies. The results indicate that global sequestration could range
	from 48Ð147 Pg C by 2105 for carbon prices ranging from $100 to more
	than $800 per t C by the end of the century. The timing of sequestration
	is found to be sensitive to the assumed carbon price path. Low initial
	carbon prices ($10 - $20 per t C in 2010) followed by rapid price
	increases, as might occur if policy makers try to stabilize future
	concentrations, suggest little, if any, sequestration during the
	next 20 years (-0.2 to 4.5 Pg C). If policy makers develop policies
	that support higher initial carbon prices, ranging from $75 to $100
	per t C, 17 to 23 Pg C could be sequestered in forests over the next
	20 years. Overall, our results indicate that forestry is not an efficient
	stopgap measure for long-term policy goals, but that it is instead
	an important long-term partner with other mitigation options.},
  booktitle = {Journal of Political Economy},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Chamberlain1982,
  author = {Chamberlain, Gary},
  title = {Multivariate regression models for panel data},
  journal = {Journal of Econometrics},
  year = {1982},
  volume = {18},
  pages = {5-46},
  number = {1},
  month = {January},
  abstract = {No abstract is available for this item.}
}

@TECHREPORT{ACC2011,
  author = {American-Chemistry-Council},
  title = {Shale Gas and New Petrochemicals Investment: Benefits for the Economy,
	Jobs, and {US} Manufacturing},
  institution = {Economics \& Statistics
	
	American Chemistry Council},
  year = {2011},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@TECHREPORT{PennState2009,
  author = {Timothy Considine and Robert Watson and Rebecca Entler and Jeffrey
	Sparks},
  title = {An Emerging Giant: Prospects and Economic Impacts of Developing the
	{M}arcellus Shale Natural Gas Play},
  institution = {The Pennsylvania State University
	
	College of Earth \& Mineral Sciences
	
	Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering},
  year = {2009},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@TECHREPORT{Coulomb2006,
  author = {Coulomb, L. and Neuhoff, K.},
  title = {Learning curves and changing product attributes: the case of wind
	turbines},
  institution = {Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge},
  year = {2006},
  type = {Cambridge Working Papers in Economics},
  number = {0618},
  month = Feb,
  abstract = {The heuristic concept of learning curves describes cost reductions
	as a function of cumulative production. A study of the Liberty shipbuilders
	suggested that product quality and production scale are other relevant
	factors that affect costs. Significant changes of attributes of a
	technology must be corrected when assessing the impact of learning-by-doing.
	We use an engineering-based model to capture the cost changes of
	wind turbines that can be attributed to changes in turbine size.
	We estimate the learning curve and turbine size parameters using
	more than 1500 price points from 1991 to 2003. The fit between model
	and empirical data confirms the concept.},
  keywords = {Learning curve; Turbine scale; Wind turbines}
}

@ARTICLE{Croissant2008,
  author = {Yves Croissant and Giovanni Millo},
  title = {Panel Data Econometrics in {R}: The {plm} Package},
  journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {27},
  number = {2},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.30}
}

@ARTICLE{Dasgupta1974,
  author = {Dasgupta, Partha and Heal, Geoffrey},
  title = {The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources},
  journal = {The Review of Economic Studies},
  year = {1974},
  volume = {41},
  pages = {3--28},
  file = {Dasgupta1974.pdf:Dasgupta1974.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00346527},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Review of Economic Studies Ltd.},
  timestamp = {2010.11.28}
}

@ARTICLE{Dasgupta1981,
  author = {Dasgupta, Partha and Stiglitz, Joseph},
  title = {Resource Depletion Under Technological Uncertainty},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {1981},
  volume = {49},
  pages = {85--104},
  number = {1},
  month = {Jan},
  abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to study the effect of uncertainty in
	the arrival date of a new technology on the rate of depletion of
	an exhaustible natural resource. It is shown that under a large class
	of circumstances uncertainty leads to a faster initial depletion
	rate if the initial resource stock is small and to greater conservation
	if it is large. A particular kind of certainty equivalence result
	is proved and the results of the paper are used to comment on possible
	interpretations of certain historical episodes of resource exhaustion.},
  file = {Dasgupta1981.pdf:Dasgupta1981.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00129682},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society},
  timestamp = {2010.11.30}
}

@UNPUBLISHED{Doda2010,
  author = {Doda, Baran},
  title = {Macroeconomics of Climate Change with Endogenous Energy Efficiency},
  year = {2010},
  abstract = {The paper studies the transition to a low carbon economy using an
	extension of
	
	the neoclassical growth model featuring endogenous energy efficiency
	(EE), ex-
	
	haustible energy and explicit climate-economy interaction. More specifically,
	the
	
	dynamic general equilibrium model I construct includes a production
	technology
	
	whose EE can be increased by making costly investments in energy saving
	capital.
	
	Conditional on the current state of knowledge in climate science and
	on the base-
	
	line model calibration, I derive the properties of the laissez faire
	equilibrium and
	
	compare them to the optimal allocations of a social planner who internalizes
	the
	
	climate change externality. Three main results emerge. First, the
	exhaustibility
	
	of energy generates strong market based incentives to improve energy
	efficiency
	
	and reduce CO2 emissions without any government intervention. Second,
	the
	
	market and optimal allocations are substantially different suggesting
	a role for
	
	the government. Third, high and persistent taxes are required to implement
	the
	
	optimal allocations as a competitive equilibrium with taxes.},
  file = {Doda2010.pdf:Doda2010.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@ARTICLE{Duke1999,
  author = {Duke, Richard and Kammen, Daniel M.},
  title = {The Economics of Energy Market Transformation Programs.},
  journal = {Energy Journal},
  year = {1999},
  volume = {20},
  pages = {15--64},
  number = {4},
  month = oct,
  abstract = {This paper evaluates three energy-sector market transformation programs:
	the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Green Lights program to
	promote on-grid efficient lighting; the World Bank Group's new Photovoltaic
	Market Transformation Initiative; and the federal grain ethanol subsidy.
	We develop a benefit-cost model that uses experience curves to estimate
	unit cost reductions as a function of cumulative production. Accounting
	for dynamic feedback between the demand response and price reductions
	from production experience raises the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of
	the first two programs substantially. The BCR of the ethanol program,
	however, is approximately zero, illustrating a technology for which
	subsidization was not justified. Our results support a broader role
	for market transformation programs to commercialize new environmentally
	attractive technologies, but the ethanol experience suggests moderately
	funding a broad portfolio composed of technologies that meet strict
	selection criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	
	Copyright of Energy Journal is the property of International Association
	for Energy Economics, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed
	to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
	express written permission. However, users may print, download, or
	email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged.
	No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should
	refer to the original published version of the material for the full
	abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)},
  comment = {Accession Number: 2434107; Duke, Richard Kammen, Daniel M.; Source
	Info: 1999, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p15; Subject Term: TECHNOLOGY; Subject
	Term: MARKETING; Subject Term: ECONOMIC development projects; Subject
	Term: ENERGY policy; Subject Term: ECONOMIC aspects; NAICS/Industry
	Codes: 926110 Administration of General Economic Programs; Number
	of Pages: 50p; Illustrations: 4 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 9 Graphs; Document
	Type: Article; Full Text Word Count: 18098},
  file = {Duke1999.pdf:Duke1999.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {01956574},
  keywords = {TECHNOLOGY, MARKETING, ECONOMIC development projects, ENERGY policy,
	ECONOMIC aspects},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {International Association for Energy Economics, Inc.},
  timestamp = {2010.12.01}
}

@TECHREPORT{EIA2012,
  author = {EIA},
  title = {Annual Energy Outlook 2012 with Projections to 2035},
  institution = {U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)},
  year = {2012},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  owner = {Huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.23}
}

@TECHREPORT{EUROPEANCOMMISSION2005,
  author = {EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Research, Directorate
	J – Energy},
  title = {Energy R\&D Statistics in the European Research Area},
  institution = {EUROPEAN COMMISSION},
  year = {2005},
  number = {EUR 21543},
  file = {EUROPEANCOMMISSION2005.pdf:EUROPEANCOMMISSION2005.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@ARTICLE{Farrell2006,
  author = {A E Farrell and A R Brandt},
  title = {Risks of the oil transition},
  journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
  year = {2006},
  volume = {1},
  pages = {014004},
  number = {1},
  abstract = {The energy system is in the early stages of a transition from conventionally
	produced oil to a variety of substitutes, bringing economic, strategic,
	and environmental risks. We argue that these three challenges are
	inherently interconnected, and that as we act to manage one we cannot
	avoid affecting our prospects in dealing with the others. We further
	argue that without appropriate policies, tradeoffs between these
	risks are likely to be made so as to allow increased environmental
	disruption in return for increased economic and energy security.
	Responsible solutions involve developing and deploying environmentally
	acceptable energy technologies (both supply and demand) rapidly enough
	to replace dwindling conventional oil production and meet growing
	demand for transportation while diversifying supply to improve energy
	security.}
}

@ARTICLE{Foster1995,
  author = {Foster, Andrew D. and Rosenzweig, Mark R.},
  title = {Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical
	Change in Agriculture},
  journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
  year = {1995},
  volume = {103},
  pages = {pp. 1176-1209},
  number = {6},
  abstract = {Household-level panel data from a nationally representative sample
	of rural Indian households describing the adoption and profitability
	of high-yielding seed varieties (HYVs) associated with the Green
	Revolution are used to test the implications of a model incorporating
	learning by doing and learning spillovers. The estimates indicate
	that (i) imperfect knowledge about the management of the new seeds
	was a significant barrier to adoption; (ii) this barrier diminished
	as farmer experience with the new technologies increased; (iii) own
	experience and neighbors' experience with HYVs significantly increased
	HYV profitability; and (iv) farmers do not fully incorporate the
	village returns to learning in making adoption decisions.},
  copyright = {Copyright © 1995 The University of Chicago Press},
  issn = {00223808},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Dec., 1995},
  language = {English},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press}
}

@TECHREPORT{Gallagher2010,
  author = {Gallagher, Kelly Sims and Laura Diaz Anadon},
  title = {DOE Budget Authority for Energy Research, Development, \& Demonstration
	Database},
  institution = {Energy Technology Innovation Policy research group, Belfer Center
	for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School},
  year = {2010},
  month = {April},
  file = {:/home/huizi/HAHA/database/DOE_EnergyTechSpending1978-FY11_2011R_June16.xls:Excel},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.30}
}

@ARTICLE{Golosov2011,
  author = {Mikhail Golosov and Maxim Troshkin and Aleh Tsyvinski},
  title = {Optimal Taxation: Merging Micro and Macro Approaches},
  journal = {Journal of Money, Credit and Banking.},
  year = {2011},
  pages = {147-174},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.05}
}

@ARTICLE{Grimaud2007,
  author = {Grimaud, André and Rougé, Luc},
  title = {Environment, Directed Technical Change and Economic Policy},
  journal = {Environmental and Resource Economics},
  year = {2007},
  volume = {41},
  pages = {439-463},
  number = {4},
  booktitle = {IDEI Working Papers},
  file = {Grimaud2007.pdf:Grimaud2007.pdf:PDF},
  keywords = {Intertemporal optimization; CO 2 emission reduction; Timing of emission
	abate-
	
	ment; Endogenous technological change},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Grubler1998,
  author = {Grübler, Arnulf and Messner, Sabine},
  title = {Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures},
  journal = {Energy Economics},
  year = {1998},
  volume = {20},
  pages = {495--512},
  number = {5-6},
  month = dec,
  abstract = {We use a coupled carbon-cycle and energy systems engineering model
	to analyze the future time path of carbon emissions under an illustrative
	CO2 concentration stabilization limit of 550 ppm. Our findings confirm
	the emission pattern as found by WRE: global emissions rise initially,
	pass through stabilization, in order to decline in the second half
	of the 21st century. We show that for a given CO2 concentration target,
	emission trajectories within an intertemporal optimization framework
	depend mainly on two factors: the discount rate, and the representation
	of technological change as either static or dynamic. We obtain a
	similar near-term emission time path as WRE when using a model with
	static technology and a discount rate of 7%. We obtain a trajectory
	with lower emissions in the near-term when using a lower discount
	rate and/or treating technology dynamics endogenously in the model.
	We briefly outline a model that endogenizes technological change
	through learning curves. We then compare differences in emission
	trajectories between alternative model formulations of technological
	change. They are sufficiently small as to be of secondary importance
	when compared to treating CO2 concentration stabilization as an inter-temporal
	optimization problem or not. Whereas our results confirm the computational
	results of WRE, we arrive nonetheless at different policy conclusions.
	If long-term emission reduction is the goal, we cannot follow [`]business
	as usual' even in the short-term. Action needs to start now. Action
	does not necessarily mean aggressive short-term emission reductions
	but rather enhanced R&D and technology demonstration efforts that
	stimulate technological learning. These are the necessary preconditions
	that long-term reduction targets can be met with improved technology
	and at costs lower than today. We close by pointing out two further
	critical issues: uncertainty, and the possible mismatch between the
	world of economic models and that of climate policy.},
  file = {Grubler1998.pdf:Grubler1998.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {0140-9883},
  keywords = {Intertemporal optimization, CO2 emission reduction, Timing of emission
	abatement, Endogenous technological change},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Hadri2000,
  author = {Kaddour Hadri},
  title = {Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data},
  journal = {Econometrics Journal},
  year = {2000},
  volume = {3},
  pages = {148-161},
  number = {2},
  abstract = { This paper proposes a residual-based Lagrange multiplier (LM) test
	for a null that the individual observed series are stationary around
	a deterministic level or around a deterministic trend against the
	alternative of a unit root in panel data. The tests which are asymptotically
	similar under the null, belong to the locally best invariant (LBI)
	test statistics. The asymptotic distributions of the statistics are
	derived under the null and are shown to be normally distributed.
	Finite sample sizes and powers are considered in a Monte Carlo experiment.
	The empirical sizes of the tests are close to the true size even
	in small samples. The testing procedure is easy to apply, including,
	to panel data models with fixed effects, individual deterministic
	trends and heterogeneous errors across cross-sections. It is also
	shown how to apply the tests to the more general case of serially
	correlated disturbance terms.},
  keywords = {Panel data; Unit roots; LBI test; LMtest; Central limit theorem; Brownian
	bridge.}
}

@ARTICLE{Hartley2012,
  author = {Peter Hartley and Kenneth B. Medlock III and Ted Temzelides and Xinya
	Zhang},
  title = {Energy Sector Innovation and Growth: An Optimal Energy Crisis},
  journal = {Baker Institute's working paper series},
  year = {2012},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.25}
}

@UNPUBLISHED{Hartley2005,
  author = {Hartley, Peter and Medlock III, Kenneth},
  title = {Carbon dioxide: A limit to growth?},
  note = {Working Paper},
  year = {2005},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Heal1976,
  author = {Heal, Geoffrey},
  title = {The Relationship between Price and Extraction Cost for a Resource
	with a Backstop Technology},
  journal = {The Bell Journal of Economics},
  year = {1976},
  volume = {7},
  pages = {371--378},
  number = {2},
  month = {Autumn},
  abstract = {This paper analyzes the optimal depletion policy for a country with
	a resource which is inexhaustible but available in various grades
	and at various costs. Cost is assumed to increase with cumulative
	extraction up to a point, but then to remain constant as a "backstop"
	supply is reached. This models accurately the supply conditions of
	minerals which may eventually be extracted from marine sources or
	crustal rocks. Emphasis is placed on the behavior of prices along
	an optimal (competitive) path, and it is shown that the price-cost
	relationship is very different from the standard one of an exponentially
	growing royalty.},
  file = {Heal1976.pdf:Heal1976.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {0361915X},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The RAND Corporation},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Hempling2008,
  author = {Hempling, Scott},
  title = {Joint Demonstration Projects: Options for Regulatory Treatment},
  journal = {The Electricity Journal},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {21},
  pages = {30--40},
  number = {5},
  month = jun,
  abstract = {States should guide developers toward technologies that satisfy multiple
	objectives for multiple states. Following this approach will lead
	to a project approval process that reduces uncertainty, while increasing
	the likelihood that the set of projects serves the public's needs.},
  file = {Hempling2008.pdf:Hempling2008.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {1040-6190},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@TECHREPORT{WVU2009,
  author = {Amy Higginbotham and Adam Pellillo and Tami Gurley-Calvez and Tom
	S. Witt},
  title = {The Economic Impact of the Natural Gas Industry and the {M}arcellus
	Shale Development in {W}est {V}irginia in 2009},
  institution = {Bureau of Business and Economic Research
	
	College of Business and Economics
	
	West Virginia University},
  year = {2009},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Hotelling1931,
  author = {Hotelling, Harold},
  title = {The Economics of Exhaustible Resources},
  journal = {The Journal of Political Economy},
  year = {1931},
  volume = {39},
  pages = {137--175},
  number = {2},
  month = {Apr},
  file = {Hotelling1931.pdf:Hotelling1931.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00223808},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@ARTICLE{Howitt1998,
  author = {Howitt, Peter and Aghion, Philippe},
  title = {Capital Accumulation and Innovation as Complementary Factors in Long-Run
	Growth},
  journal = {Journal of Economic Growth},
  year = {1998},
  volume = {3},
  pages = {pp. 111-130},
  number = {2},
  abstract = {We study capital accumulation and innovation as determinants of long-
	run growth by adding capital to our earlier model of creative destruction.
	No special functional forms are imposed on the aggregate production
	function. The equations describing perfect foresight equilibrium
	are identical to those of the augmented Ramsey- Cass- Koopmans model,
	except that the rate of technological change is a function of the
	stock of capital per effective worker. Contrary to previous models,
	a subsidy to capital accumulation will raise the long- run growth
	rate. The key assumption is that capital is used in R&D. Some evidence
	is presented on the capital intensity of R&D.},
  copyright = {Copyright Â© 1998 Springer},
  issn = {13814338},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Jun., 1998},
  language = {English},
  owner = {Huizi},
  publisher = {Springer},
  timestamp = {2012.03.01}
}

@TECHREPORT{IHS2012,
  author = {IHS},
  title = {The Economic and Employment Contributions of Shale Gas in the {U}nited
	{S}tates},
  institution = {America's Natural Gas Alliance},
  year = {2012},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Im1999,
  author = {Kyung So Im and Seung C. Ahn and Peter Schmidt and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge},
  title = {Efficient estimation of panel data models with strictly exogenous
	explanatory variables},
  journal = {Journal of Econometrics},
  year = {1999},
  volume = {93},
  pages = {177 - 201},
  number = {1},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  abstract = {With panel data, exogeneity assumptions imply many more moment conditions
	than standard estimators use. However, many of the moment conditions
	may be redundant, in the sense that they do not increase efficiency;
	if so, we may establish the standard estimatorsâ€™ efficiency. We
	prove efficiency results for GLS in a model with unrestricted error
	covariance matrix, and for 3SLS in models where regressors and errors
	are correlated, such as the Hausmanâ€“Taylor model. For models with
	correlation between regressors and errors, and with unrestricted
	error covariance structure, we provide a simple estimator based on
	a GLS generalization of deviations from means.},
  doi = {10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00008-1},
  issn = {0304-4076},
  keywords = {Panel data},
  owner = {Huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.23}
}

@ARTICLE{Im2003,
  author = {Kyung So Im and M.Hashem Pesaran and Yongcheol Shin},
  title = {Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels },
  journal = {Journal of Econometrics },
  year = {2003},
  volume = {115},
  pages = {53 - 74},
  number = {1},
  doi = {10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7},
  issn = {0304-4076},
  keywords = {Heterogeneous dynamic panels},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407603000927}
}

@TECHREPORT{NRDC2012,
  author = {Phil Jordan and Cai Steger},
  title = {American Wind Farms: Breaking Down the Benefits from Planning to
	Production},
  institution = {Natural Resources Defense Council},
  year = {2012},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Jovanovic1996,
  author = {Jovanovic, Boyan and Nyarko, Yaw},
  title = {Learning by Doing and the Choice of Technology},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {1996},
  volume = {64},
  pages = {1299--1310},
  number = {6},
  month = {Nov},
  abstract = {This is a one-agent Bayesian model of learning by doing and technology
	choice. The more the agent uses a technology, the better he learns
	its parameters, and the more productive he gets. This expertise is
	a form of human capital. Any given technology has bounded productivity,
	which therefore can grow in the long run only if the agent keeps
	switching to better technologies. But a switch of technologies temporarily
	reduces expertise: The bigger is the technological leap, the bigger
	the loss in expertise. The prospect of a productivity drop may prevent
	the agent from climbing the technological ladder as quickly as he
	might. Indeed, an agent may be so skilled at some technology that
	he will never switch again, so that he will experience no long-run
	growth. In contrast, someone who is less skilled (and therefore less
	productive) at that technology may find it optimal to switch technologies
	over and over again, and therefore enjoy long-run growth in output.
	Thus the model can give rise to overtaking.},
  file = {Jovanovic1996.pdf:Jovanovic1996.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00129682},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@BOOK{Judd1998,
  title = {Numerical Methods in Economics},
  publisher = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology},
  year = {1998},
  author = {Judd, Kenneth L.},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.12.03}
}

@ARTICLE{Kammen2005,
  author = {Kammen, D.M. and G.F. Nemet},
  title = {Real numbers: reversing the incredible shrinking energy R\&D budget},
  journal = {Science and Technology},
  year = {2005},
  volume = {22},
  pages = {84-88},
  number = {1},
  file = {Kammen2005.pdf:Kammen2005.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.30}
}

@ARTICLE{Kapoor2007,
  author = {Mudit Kapoor and Harry H. Kelejian and Ingmar R. Prucha},
  title = {Panel data models with spatially correlated error components },
  journal = {Journal of Econometrics },
  year = {2007},
  volume = {140},
  pages = {97 - 130},
  number = {1},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.004},
  issn = {0304-4076},
  keywords = {Panel data model},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407606002259}
}

@ARTICLE{Klaassen2005,
  author = {Ger Klaassen and Asami Miketa and Katarina Larsen and Thomas Sundqvist},
  title = {The impact of {R}\&{D} on innovation for wind energy in {D}enmark,
	{G}ermany and the {U}nited {K}ingdom},
  journal = {Ecological Economics},
  year = {2005},
  volume = {54},
  pages = {227 - 240},
  number = {2–3},
  doi = {10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.008},
  issn = {0921-8009},
  keywords = {Costs},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800905000340}
}

@ARTICLE{Klette2004,
  author = {Klette, Tor Jakob and Kortum, Samuel},
  title = {Innovating Firms and Aggregate Innovation},
  journal = {The Journal of Political Economy},
  year = {2004},
  volume = {112},
  pages = {986--1018},
  number = {5},
  month = {Oct},
  abstract = {We develop a parsimonious model of innovation to confront firm-level
	evidence. It captures the dynamics of individual heterogeneous firms,
	describes the behavior of an industry with firm entry and exit, and
	delivers a general equilibrium model of technological change. While
	unifying the theoretical analysis of firms, industries, and the aggregate
	economy, the model yields insights into empirical work on innovating
	firms. It accounts for the persistence of firms' R&D investment,
	the concentration of R&D among incumbents, the link between R&D and
	patenting, and why R&D as a fraction of revenues is positively correlated
	with firm productivity but not with firm size or growth.},
  file = {Klette2004.pdf:Klette2004.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00223808},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Kwiatkowski1992,
  author = {Denis Kwiatkowski and Peter C.B. Phillips and Peter Schmidt and Yongcheol
	Shin},
  title = {Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative
	of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a
	unit root? },
  journal = {Journal of Econometrics },
  year = {1992},
  volume = {54},
  pages = {159 - 178},
  number = {1–3},
  doi = {10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y},
  issn = {0304-4076},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030440769290104Y}
}

@ARTICLE{Kydland1982,
  author = {Kydland, Finn E. and Prescott, Edward C.},
  title = {Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {1982},
  volume = {50},
  pages = {pp. 1345-1370},
  number = {6},
  abstract = {The equilibrium growth model is modified and used to explain the cyclical
	variances of a set of economic time series, the covariances between
	real output and the other series, and the autocovariance of output.
	The model is fitted to quarterly data for the post-war U.S. economy.
	Crucial features of the model are the assumption that more than one
	time period is required for the construction of new productive capital,
	and the non-time-separable utility function that admits greater intertemporal
	substitution of leisure. The fit is surprisingly good in light of
	the model's simplicity and the small number of free parameters.},
  copyright = {Copyright © 1982 The Econometric Society},
  issn = {00129682},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Nov., 1982},
  language = {English},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society}
}

@TECHREPORT{Lantz2009,
  author = {E. Lantz and S. Tegen},
  title = {NREL Response to the Report Study of the Effects on Employment of
	Public Aid to Renewable Energy Sources from King Juan Carlos University
	(Spain)},
  institution = {National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)},
  year = {2009},
  type = {White Paper},
  number = {NREL/TP-6A2-46261},
  month = {August},
  abstract = {Job generation has been a part of the national dialogue surrounding
	energy policy and renewable energy (RE) for
	
	many years. RE advocates tout the ability of renewable energy to support
	new job opportunities in rural locations and
	
	the manufacturing sector. Others argue that spending on renewable
	energy is an inefficient allocation of resources
	
	and can result in job losses in the broader economy. The report Study
	of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to
	
	Renewable Energy Sources, from King Juan Carlos University in Spain,
	is one recent addition to this debate. The
	
	report asserts that, on average, every renewable energy job in Spain
	“destroyed” 2.2 jobs in the broader Spanish
	
	economy. The authors also apply this ratio in the U.S. context to
	estimate expected job loss from renewable energy
	
	development and policy in the United States. This white paper discusses
	fundamental and technical limitations of the
	
	analysis conducted by King Juan Carlos University and notes critical
	shortcomings in assumptions implicit in the
	
	conclusions. The white paper also includes a review of traditional
	employment impact analyses that rely on accepted,
	
	peer-reviewed methodologies, and it highlights specific variables
	that can significantly influence the results of
	
	employment impact analysis.},
  file = {Lantz2009.pdf:Lantz2009.pdf:PDF},
  journal = {National Renewable Energy Laboratory, White Paper},
  keywords = {NREL; renewable energy; job generation; RE; King Juan Carlos University
	of Spain; U.S. jobs; employment; analysis;
	
	job impacts; job development; energy sources; manufacturing; Eric
	Lantz; Suzanne Tegen},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26},
  volume = {NREL/TP-6A2-46261}
}

@ARTICLE{Lentz2005,
  author = {Lentz, Rasmus and Mortensen, Dale T.},
  title = {An Empirical Model of Growth Through Product Innovation},
  journal = {National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series},
  year = {2005},
  volume = {No. 11546},
  pages = {--},
  abstract = {Productivity dispersion across firms is large and persistent, and
	worker reallocation among firms is an important source of productivity
	growth. The purpose of the paper is to estimate the structure of
	an equilibrium model of growth through innovation that explains these
	facts. The model is a modified version of the Schumpeterian theory
	of firm evolution and growth developed by Klette and Kortum (2004).
	The data set is a panel of Danish firms than includes information
	on value added, employment, and wages. The model's fit is good and
	the structural parameter estimates have interesting implications
	for the aggregate growth rate and the contribution of worker reallocation
	to it.},
  comment = {Author contact info: Rasmus Lentz Department of Economics University
	of Wisconsin, Madison 1180 Observatory Drive Madison, WI 53706 Tel:
	608/262-5373 Fax: 608/262-2033 E-Mail: rlentz@ssc.wisc.edu},
  file = {Lentz2005.pdf:Lentz2005.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@BOOK{Leonard1992,
  title = {Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  year = {1992},
  author = {Leonard, Daniel and Van Long, Ngo},
  file = {Leonard1992.pdf:Leonard1992.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@BOOK{LeSage2009,
  title = {Introduction to Spatial Econometrics},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis/CRC Press},
  year = {2009},
  author = {James LeSage and Robert Kelley Pace},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  owner = {Huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.23}
}

@ARTICLE{Levin2002,
  author = {Andrew Levin and Chien-Fu Lin and Chia-Shang James Chu},
  title = {Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
	},
  journal = {Journal of Econometrics},
  year = {2002},
  volume = {108},
  pages = {1 - 24},
  number = {1},
  doi = {10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7},
  issn = {0304-4076},
  keywords = {\{ADF\} regression},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407601000987}
}

@ARTICLE{Lucas1971,
  author = {Lucas, Robert E., Jr and Prescott, Edward C.},
  title = {Investment Under Uncertainty},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {1971},
  volume = {39},
  pages = {659--681},
  number = {5},
  month = {Sep},
  abstract = {This paper determines the time series behavior of investment, output,
	and prices in a competitive industry with a stochastic demand. It
	is shown, first, that the equilibrium development for the industry
	solves a particular dynamic programming problem (maximization of
	"consumer surplus"). This problem is then studied to determine the
	characteristics of the equilibrium paths.},
  file = {Lucas1971.pdf:Lucas1971.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00129682},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@ARTICLE{Margolis1999,
  author = {Margolis, Robert M. and Kammen, Daniel M.},
  title = {Evidence of under-investment in energy R\&D in the United States
	and the impact of Federal policy},
  journal = {Energy Policy},
  year = {1999},
  volume = {27},
  pages = {575--584},
  number = {10},
  month = oct,
  abstract = {Investments in energy technology research and development (R&D), and
	in associated human and institutional capacity, are fundamental to
	our ability to respond to changing economic and environmental needs.
	This paper uses data on R&D investments and patent records to examine
	the relationship between expenditures on R&D and innovation, with
	a particular focus on the energy sector. We observe that R&D spending
	and patents, both overall and in the energy sector, have been highly
	correlated over the past two decades in the US. In addition, we observe
	that the R&D intensity of the US energy sector is extremely low when
	compared to other sectors. We argue that the data illustrates the
	critical role of public policy, as evidenced by the impact of recent
	technology transfer related legislation on the total number and on
	the ownership of innovations resulting from federally sponsored R&D.
	We conclude that there has been a significant and sustained pattern
	of under-investment in the US energy sector, and that recent declines
	in energy R&D exacerbate this situation. Innovation for the US energy
	infrastructure is also a significant driver of the international
	energy economy. Thus, the spillover from US under-investment detracts
	from the global capacity to respond to emerging risks such as global
	warming.},
  file = {Margolis1999.pdf:Margolis1999.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {0301-4215},
  keywords = {Energy policy, Energy R&D, Patents},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@BOOK{Mas-Colell1995,
  title = {Microeconomic Theory},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  year = {1995},
  author = {Andreu Mas-Colell and Michael D. Whinston and Jerry R. Green},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.10}
}

@TECHREPORT{McKinsey2006,
  author = {McKinsey},
  title = {Wind, Oil and Gas: The Potential of Wind.},
  institution = {McKinsey Consulting},
  year = {,2006.},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Nemet2007,
  author = {Nemet, Gregory F. and Kammen, Daniel M.},
  title = {U.S. energy research and development: Declining investment, increasing
	need, and the feasibility of expansion},
  journal = {Energy Policy},
  year = {2007},
  volume = {35},
  pages = {746--755},
  number = {1},
  month = jan,
  abstract = {Investment in energy research and development in the U.S. is declining
	despite calls for an enhancement of the nation's capacity for innovation
	to address environmental, geopolitical, and macroeconomic concerns.
	We examine investments in research and development in the energy
	sector, and observe broad-based declines in funding since the mid-1990s.
	The large reductions in investment by the private sector should be
	a particular area of concern for policy makers. Multiple measures
	of patenting activity reveal widespread declines in innovative activity
	that are correlated with research and development (R&D) investment--notably
	in the environmentally significant wind and solar areas. Trends in
	venture capital investment and fuel cell innovation are two promising
	cases that run counter to the overall trends in the sector. We draw
	on prior work on the optimal level of energy R&D to identify a range
	of values which would be adequate to address energy-related concerns.
	Comparing simple scenarios based on this range to past public R&D
	programs and industry investment data indicates that a five to ten-fold
	increase in energy R&D investment is both warranted and feasible.},
  file = {Nemet2007.pdf:Nemet2007.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {0301-4215},
  keywords = {Energy R&D, Innovation, Patents},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@ARTICLE{Newey1990,
  author = {Newey, Whitney K.},
  title = {Efficient Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Models},
  journal = {Econometrica},
  year = {1990},
  volume = {58},
  pages = {809--837},
  number = {4},
  month = {Jul},
  abstract = {This paper considers asymptotically efficient instrumental variables
	estimation of nonlinear models in an i.i.d. environment. The class
	of models includes nonlinear simultaneous equations models and other
	models of interest. A problem in constructing efficient instrumental
	variables estimators for such models is that the optimal instruments
	involve a conditional expectation, calculation of which can require
	functional form assumptions for the conditional distribution of endogenous
	variables, as well as integration. Nonparametric methods provide
	a way of avoiding this difficulty. Here it is shown that nonparametric
	estimates of the optimal instruments can give asymptotically efficient
	instrumental variables estimators. Also, ways of choosing the nonparametric
	estimate in applications are discussed. Two types of nonparametric
	estimates of the optimal instruments are considered. Each involves
	nonparametric regression, one by nearest neighbor and the other by
	series approximation. The finite sample properties of the estimators
	are considered in a small sampling experiment involving an endogenous
	dummy variable model.},
  file = {Newey1990.pdf:Newey1990.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00129682},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Econometric Society},
  timestamp = {2010.11.27}
}

@ARTICLE{Nordhaus1973,
  author = {Nordhaus, William D. and Houthakker, Hendrik and Solow, Robert},
  title = {The Allocation of Energy Resources},
  journal = {Brookings Papers on Economic Activity},
  year = {1973},
  volume = {1973},
  pages = {529--576},
  number = {3},
  file = {Nordhaus1973.pdf:Nordhaus1973.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00072303},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Brookings Institution},
  timestamp = {2010.11.30}
}

@ARTICLE{Parente1994,
  author = {Stephen L. Parente},
  title = {Technology Adoption, Learning-by-Doing, and Economic Growth},
  journal = {Journal of Economic Theory},
  year = {1994},
  volume = {63},
  pages = {346 - 369},
  number = {2},
  doi = {10.1006/jeth.1994.1046},
  issn = {0022-0531}
}

@TECHREPORT{Pesaran2004,
  author = {Pesaran, M.H.},
  title = {General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels},
  institution = {Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge},
  year = {2004},
  type = {Cambridge Working Papers in Economics},
  number = {0435},
  month = Jun,
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  abstract = {This paper proposes simple tests of error cross section dependence
	which are applicable to a variety of panel data models, including
	stationary and unit root dynamic heterogeneous panels with short
	T and large N. The proposed tests are based on average of pair-wise
	correlation coefficients of the OLS residuals from the individual
	regressions in the panel, and can be used to test for cross section
	dependence of any fixed order p, as well as the case where no a priori
	ordering of the cross section units is assumed, referred to a CD(p)
	and CD tests, respectively. Asymptotic distribution of these tests
	are derived and their power function analysed under different alternatives.
	It is shown that these test are correctly centred for fixed N and
	T, and are robust to single or multiple breaks in the slope coefficients
	and/or error variances. The small sample properties of the tests
	have the correct size in very small samples and satisfactory power,
	and as predicted by the theory, quite robust to the presence of unit
	roots and structural breaks. The use of the CD test is illustrated
	by applying it to study the degree of dependence in per capital output
	innovations across countries within a given region and across countries
	in different regions. The results show significant evidence of cross
	dependence in output innovations across many countries and regions
	of the world.},
  keywords = {cross section dependence; spatial dependence; diagnostic tests; dynamic
	heterogeneous panels; empiri},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.30}
}

@TECHREPORT{VanderPloeg2012,
  author = {Frederick van der Ploeg},
  title = {Breakthrough Renewables and the Green Paradox},
  institution = {Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University
	of Oxford},
  year = {2012},
  type = {OxCarre Working Papers},
  number = {091},
  abstract = {We show how a monopolistic owner of oil reserves responds to a carbon-free
	substitute becoming available at some uncertain point in the future
	if demand is isoelaastic and variable extraction costs are zero but
	upfron exploration investment costs have to be made. Not the arrival
	of this substitute matters for efficiency, but the uncertainty about
	the timing of this substitute coming on stream. Before the carbon-free
	substitute comes on stream, oil rserves are depleted too rapidly;
	as soon as the substitute has arrived, the oil depletion rate drops
	and the oil price jumps up by a discrete amount. Subsidizing green
	R\&D to speed up the introduction of breakthrough renewables leads
	to more rapid oil extraction before the breakthrough, but more oil
	is left in situ as exploration investment will be lower. The latter
	offsets the Green Paradox.},
  keywords = {Hotelling principle; exhaustible resources; carbon-free substitute;
	regime switch; oil stock; uncert}
}

@TECHREPORT{Pollin2008,
  author = {Pollin, Robert and Garrett-Peltier, Heidi and Heintz, James and Scharber,
	Helen},
  title = {Green Recovery: A Program to Create Good Jobs \& Start Building a
	Low-Carbon Economy},
  institution = {Center for American Progress and Political Economy Research Institute},
  year = {2008},
  booktitle = {Published Studies},
  file = {Pollin2008.pdf:Pollin2008.pdf:PDF},
  keywords = {agricultural labor; household models; labor market},
  owner = {huizi},
  pages = {--},
  publisher = {Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts
	at Amherst},
  timestamp = {2010.11.28}
}

@ARTICLE{Popp2002,
  author = {Popp, David},
  title = {Induced Innovation and Energy Prices},
  journal = {The American Economic Review},
  year = {2002},
  volume = {92},
  pages = {160--180},
  number = {1},
  month = {Mar},
  abstract = {I use U.S. patent data from 1970 to 1994 to estimate the effect of
	energy prices on energy-efficient innovations. Using patent citations
	to construct a measure of the usefulness of the existing base of
	scientific knowledge, I consider the effect of both demand-side factors,
	which spur innovative activity by increasing the value of new innovations,
	and supply-side factors, such as scientific advancements that make
	new innovations possible. I find that both energy prices and the
	quality of existing knowledge have strongly significant positive
	effects on innovation. Furthermore, I show that omitting the quality
	of knowledge adversely affects the estimation results.},
  file = {Popp2002.pdf:Popp2002.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00028282},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {American Economic Association},
  timestamp = {2010.11.28}
}

@ARTICLE{Prescott1987,
  author = {Prescott, Edward C. and Boyd, John H.},
  title = {Dynamic Coalitions: Engines of Growth},
  journal = {The American Economic Review},
  year = {1987},
  volume = {77},
  pages = {63--67},
  number = {2},
  month = {May},
  file = {Prescott1987.pdf:Prescott1987.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00028282},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {American Economic Association},
  timestamp = {2010.11.26}
}

@TECHREPORT{PWHC2009,
  author = {PriceWaterHouseCoopers},
  title = {The Economic Impacts of the Oil And Natural Gas Industry On The U.S.Economy:
	Employment, Labor Income And Value Added},
  institution = {PriceWaterHouseCoopers and American Petroleum Institute},
  year = {2009},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@TECHREPORT{Rubio2009,
  author = {Rubio, S.J. and García, J.R. and Hueso, J.L.},
  title = {Neoclassical Growth, Environment and Technological Change: The Environmental
	Kuznets Curve},
  institution = {Center for American Progress},
  year = {2009},
  number = {2009.125},
  booktitle = {Working Papers},
  owner = {huizi},
  pages = {--},
  publisher = {Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei},
  timestamp = {2010.12.01}
}

@ARTICLE{Schall1971,
  author = {Schall, Lawrence D.},
  title = {Technological Externalities and Resource Allocation},
  journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
  year = {1971},
  volume = {79},
  pages = {pp. 983-1001},
  number = {5},
  abstract = {This paper is an examination of the effects on resource allocation
	of technological externalities within a given industry. A competitive
	equilibrium in the presence of technological externalities in production
	is compared with a Pareto optimum in terms of input use and final
	outputs of the economy. Resource allocation with technological externalities
	and imperfect competition is also compared with the competitive and
	Pareto-optimal solutions. It is shown that standard theory's approach
	for comparing resource use requires extremely restrictive assumptions
	and, in general, can lead to significant errors.},
  copyright = {Copyright © 1971 The University of Chicago Press},
  issn = {00223808},
  jstor_articletype = {research-article},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Sep. - Oct., 1971},
  language = {English},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press}
}

@TECHREPORT{HaynesShale2009,
  author = {Scott\&Associates},
  title = {The Economic Impact Of The {H}aynesville Shale On The {L}ouisiana
	Economy In 2009},
  institution = {Loren C. Scott \& Associates},
  year = {2009},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@TECHREPORT{TCU2009,
  author = {Michael Slattery and Becky Richards and Ellen Schwaller and Jeffrey
	Swofford and Lisa Thompson},
  title = {Job and Economic Development Impact Model ({JEDI}) Validation {C}apricorn
	{R}idge and {H}orse {H}ollow, {T}exas},
  institution = {The Institute for Environmental Studies at Texas Christian University
	and NextEra Energy},
  year = {2009},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Stiglitz1974,
  author = {Stiglitz, Joseph},
  title = {Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal
	Growth Paths},
  journal = {The Review of Economic Studies},
  year = {1974},
  volume = {41},
  pages = {123--137},
  file = {Stiglitz1974.pdf:Stiglitz1974.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00346527},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Review of Economic Studies Ltd.},
  timestamp = {2010.11.28}
}

@ARTICLE{Stiglitz1974a,
  author = {Stiglitz, Joseph E.},
  title = {Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: The Competitive Economy},
  journal = {The Review of Economic Studies},
  year = {1974},
  volume = {41},
  pages = {139--152},
  file = {Stiglitz1974a.pdf:Stiglitz1974a.pdf:PDF},
  issn = {00346527},
  owner = {huizi},
  publisher = {The Review of Economic Studies Ltd.},
  timestamp = {2010.11.28}
}

@TECHREPORT{UTSA2012,
  author = {UTSA},
  title = {Economic Impact of the {E}agle {F}ord Shale},
  institution = {The University of Texas at San Antonio Institute for Economic Development’s
	Center for Community and Business Research.},
  year = {2012},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@TECHREPORT{Dallas2012,
  author = {Robert W.Gilmer and Raul Hernandez and Keith R. Phillips},
  title = {Oil boom in {E}agle {F}ord shale brings new wealth to south Texas},
  institution = {Federal reserve bank of Dallas},
  year = {2012},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.04.15}
}

@ARTICLE{Wei2010,
  author = {Max Wei and Shana Patadia and Daniel M. Kammena},
  title = {Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can
	the clean energy industry generate in the {US}?},
  journal = {Energy Policy},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {38},
  pages = {919–931},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  abstract = {An analytical job creation model for the US power sector from 2009
	to 2030 is presented. The model
	
	synthesizes data from 15 job studies covering renewable energy (RE),
	energy efficiency (EE), carbon
	
	capture and storage (CCS) and nuclear power. The paper employs a consistent
	methodology of
	
	normalizing job data to average employment per unit energy produced
	over plant lifetime. Job losses in
	
	the coal and natural gas industry are modeled to project net employment
	impacts. Benefits and
	
	drawbacks of the methodology are assessed and the resulting model
	is used for job projections under
	
	various renewable portfolio standards (RPS), EE, and low carbon energy
	scenarios We find that all non-
	
	fossil fuel technologies (renewable energy, EE, low carbon) create
	more jobs per unit energy than coal
	
	and natural gas. Aggressive EE measures combined with a 30% RPS target
	in 2030 can generate over 4
	
	million full-time-equivalent job-years by 2030 while increasing nuclear
	power to 25% and CCS to 10% of
	
	overall generation in 2030 can yield an additional 500,000 job-years.},
  file = {:D\:\\research\\green-jobs\\ref\\paperbib\\Wei2010.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {Huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.23}
}

@BOOK{Wene2000,
  title = {Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy},
  publisher = {OECD/IEA},
  year = {2000},
  author = {Clas-Otto Wene},
  file = {Wene2000.pdf:Wene2000.pdf:PDF},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2010.12.01}
}

@BOOK{Wooldridge2002,
  title = {Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data},
  publisher = {The MIT Press},
  year = {2002},
  author = {Jeffrey M. Wooldridge},
  number = {0262232197},
  series = {MIT Press Books},
  __markedentry = {[huizi:6]},
  abstract = {This graduate text provides an intuitive but rigorous treatment of
	contemporary methods used in microeconometric research. The book
	makes clear that applied microeconometrics is about the estimation
	of marginal and treatment effects, and that parametric estimation
	is simply a means to this end. It also clarifies the distinction
	between causality and statistical association. The book focuses specifically
	on cross section and panel data methods. Population assumptions are
	stated separately from sampling assumptions, leading to simple statements
	as well as to important insights. The unified approach to linear
	and nonlinear models and to cross section and panel data enables
	straightforward coverage of more advanced methods. The numerous end-of-chapter
	problems are an important component of the book. Some problems contain
	important points not fully described in the text, and others cover
	new ideas that can be analyzed using tools presented in the current
	and previous chapters. Several problems require the use of the data
	sets located at the author's website.},
  owner = {huizi},
  timestamp = {2013.03.30}
}

@comment{jabref-meta: selector_publisher:}

@comment{jabref-meta: selector_author:}

@comment{jabref-meta: selector_journal:}

@comment{jabref-meta: selector_keywords:}

